Giacobbe Giusti, GIAMPIETRINO: Magdalena Penitente, Hermitage

Giacobbe Giusti, GIAMPIETRINO: Magdalena Penitente, Hermitage

 

 

Bibliography[

• Bock, Darrell L. (2004), Breaking The Da Vinci Code, Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, pp. 143–144, ISBN 978-1-4185-1338-2
• Bradshaw, Peter (February 27, 2018), « Mary Magdalene review – toothless attempt to overturn Sunday school myths: Rooney Mara brings her customary intensity to the title role as Jesus’ ‘favourite pupil’, but the result is a bit too solemn to be a convincing reinvention », The Guardian
• Campbell, Lorne (2009), « The New Pictorial Language of Rogier van der Weyden », in Campbell, Lorne; Van der Stock, Jan, Rogier Van Der Weyden: 1400-1464 : Master of Passions, Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock, pp. 2–64, ISBN 9789085261056
• Carr, Flora (March 30, 2018), « The Real Reason Why Mary Magdalene Is Such a Controversial Figure », TIME
• Casey, Maurice (2010), Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of His Life and Teaching, New York City, New York and London, England: T & T Clark, ISBN 978-0-567-64517-3
• Crossan, John Dominic (1995), Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography, San Francisco, California: HarperOne, ISBN 0-06-061662-8
• « Life of Mary Magdalen », William Caxton‘s English version of the Golden Legend of Jacobus de Voragine
• Chilton, Bruce (2005), Mary Magdalene: A Biography, New York City, New York, London, England, Toronto, Ontario, Sydney, Australia, and Auckland, New Zealand: Image Doubleday, ISBN 978-0-385-51318-0
• Dalton, Stephen (February 27, 2018), « Mary Magdalene: Film Review », The Hollywood Reporter
• DeConick, April D. (2011), Holy Misogyny: Why the Sex and Gender Conflicts in the Early Church Still Matter, New York City, New York and London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 978-1-4411-9602-6
• Ehrman, Bart D. (2004), Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-518140-9
• Ehrman, Bart D. (2006), Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-530013-0
• Ehrman, Bart D. (2014), How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee, New York City, New York: HarperOne, ISBN 978-0-06-177818-6
• Erhardt, Michelle; Morris, Amy (2012), « Introduction », Mary Magdalene: Iconographic Studies from the Middle Ages to the Baroque, Studies in Religion and the Arts, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-23224-2
• Ferguson, George (1976) [1954], « St. Mary Magdalene », Signs and Symbols in Christian Art, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 134–135
• Foss, Clive (1979), Ephesus After Antiquity: A Late Antique, Byzantine and Turkish City, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-22086-6
• Geneva Press (2008), The Presbyterian Handbook for Pastors, Louiseville, Kentucky: Geneva Press, ISBN 978-0-664-50299-7
• Green, Mary E. (2014), « Mary Magdalene, the Myrrh Bearer », Eyes to See: The Redemptive Purpose of Icons, New York City, New York, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Denver Colorado: Morehouse Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8192-2939-7
• Haag, Michael (2016), The Quest For Mary Magdalene: History & Legend, London, England: Profile Books, ISBN 978-1847659385
• Hailes, Sam (March 6, 2018), « Why Mary Magdalene is the Hollywood film Christians have been waiting for: This new movie paints a clear picture of Jesus, says Sam Hailes », Premiere Christianity
• Haskins, Susan (2005) [1993], Mary Magdalen: Myth and Metaphor, New York City, New York: Pimplico, ISBN 1-8459-5004-6
• Herzog, William R. (2005), Prophet and Teacher: An Introduction to the Historical Jesus, Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster Knox Press, ISBN 0-664-22528-4
• Hinkle, Mary (2003) [1986], « Mary Magdalene », in Fahlbusch, Erwin; Lochman, Jan Milič; Mbiti, John; Pelikan, Jaroslav; Vischer, Lukas; Bromiley, Geoffrey W.; Barrett, David B., The Encyclopedia of Christianity, J-O, 3, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Cambridge, England, Leiden, The Netherlands, and Boston, Massachusetts: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company and Brill, pp. 446–448, ISBN 0-8028-2415-3
• Johnston, Barbara, « Sacred Kingship and Royal Patronage in the La Vie de la Magdalene: Pilgrimage, Politics, Passion Plays, and the Life of Louise of Savoy » (Florida State), R. Neuman, Dissertation, PDF, 88–93
• Jones, Roger; Penny, Nicholas (1983), Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0300040524
• Kelly, Henry Ansgar (2006), Satan: A Biography, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521604024
• Kim, Young Richard (2015), Epiphanius of Cyprus: Imagining an Orthodox World, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp. 37–39, ISBN 978-0-472-11954-7
• King, Ross (2012), Leonardo and the Last Supper, New York City, New York and London, England: Bloomsbury, ISBN 978-0-7475-9947-0
• Kugelmann, Robert (1983), The Windows of Soul: Psychological Physiology of the Human Eye and Primary Glaucoma, London, England and Toronto, Canada: Associated University Presses, ISBN 0-8387-5035-4
• Lang, J. Stephen (2003), What the Good Book Didn’t Say: Popular Myths and Misconceptions About the Bible, New York City New York: Citadel Press, ISBN 0-8065-2460-X
• Levine, Amy-Jill; Allison, Dale C. Jr.; Crossan, John Dominic (October 16, 2006), The Historical Jesus in Context, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-00992-9
• Maisch, Ingrid (1998) [1996], Mary Magdalene: The Image of a Woman through the Centuries, translated by Maloney, Linda M., Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Presss, ISBN 0-8146-2471-5
• Powell, Mark Allen (1998), Jesus as a Figure in History: How Modern Historians View the Man from Galilee, Louiseville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, p. 168, ISBN 978-0-664-25703-3
• Pringle, Denys (1998), « Magdala », The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Corpus, II: L-Z (excluding Tyre), Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-39037-0
• Roper, Lyndal (2016), Martin Luther: Renegade and Prophet, New York City, New York: Random House, ISBN 9780812996203
• Sabar, Ariel (2016), « The Scholar Who Discovered the ‘Jesus’s Wife’ Fragment Now Says It’s Likely a Fake », The Atlantic
• Sanders, E. P. (1993), The Historical Figure of Jesus, London, England, New York City, New York, Ringwood, Australia, Toronto, Ontario, and Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books, ISBN 0-14-014499-4
• Schaberg, Jane (2004) [2002], The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene: Legends, Apocrypha, and the Christian Testament, New York City, New York and London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-8264-1645-4
• Strong, Steven; Strong, Evan (2008), Mary Magdalene’s Dreaming: A Comparison of Aboriginal Wisdom and Gnostic Scripture, Lanham, Maryland, Boulder, Colorado, New York City, New York, Toronto, Ontario, and Plymouth, England: University Press of America, ISBN 978-0-7618-4281-1
• Wilson, Kenneth (2011), Methodist Theology, Doing Theology, London, England and New York City, New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, ISBN 978-0-5670-8135-3
• Witcombe, Christopher L. C. E. (June 2002), « The Chapel of the Courtesan and the Quarrel of the Magdalens », The Art Bulletin, New York City, New York: College Art Association, 84 (2): 273–292, doi:10.2307/3177269, JSTOR 3177269
• Wright, N. T. (March 1, 2003), The Resurrection of the Son of God, Christian Origins and the Question of God, 3, Eugene, Oregon: Fortress Press, ISBN 978-0800626792

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Magdalene

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Period	Bronze Age
Dates	c. 1600 – c. 1100 BC
Preceded by	Minoan civilization
Followed by	Greek Dark Ages

Part of a series on the
History of Greece
Neolithic Greece[show]
Greek Bronze Age[show]
v t e

Mycenaean Greece (or Mycenaean civilization) was the last phase of the Bronze Age in Ancient Greece, spanning the period from approximately 1600–1100 BC. It represents the first advanced civilization in mainland Greece, with its palatial states, urban organization, works of art and writing system.^[1] Among the centers of power that emerged, the most notable were those of Pylos, Tiryns, Midea in the Peloponnese, Orchomenos, Thebes, Athens in Central Greece and Iolcos in Thessaly. The most prominent site was Mycenae, in Argolid, after which the culture of this era is named. Mycenaean and Mycenaean-influenced settlements also appeared in Epirus,^[2][3]Macedonia,^[4][5] on islands in the Aegean Sea, on the coast of Asia Minor, the Levant,^[6] Cyprus^[7] and Italy.^[8]

The Mycenaean Greeks introduced several innovations in the fields of engineering, architecture and military infrastructure, while trade over vast areas of the Mediterranean was essential for the Mycenaean economy. Their syllabic script, the Linear B, offers the first written records of the Greek language and their religion already included several deities that can also be found in the Olympic Pantheon. Mycenaean Greece was dominated by a warrior elite society and consisted of a network of palace states that developed rigid hierarchical, political, social and economic systems. At the head of this society was the king, known as wanax.

Mycenaean Greece perished with the collapse of Bronze Age culturein the eastern Mediterranean, to be followed by the so-called Greek Dark Ages, a recordless transitional period leading to Archaic Greecewhere significant shifts occurred from palace-centralized to de-centralized forms of socio-economic organization (including the extensive use of iron).^[9] Various theories have been proposed for the end of this civilization, among them the Dorian invasion or activities connected to the « Sea Peoples« . Additional theories such as natural disasters and climatic changes have been also suggested. The Mycenaean period became the historical setting of much ancient Greek literature and mythology, including the Trojan Epic Cycle.^[10]

Chronology

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

The Lion Gate, the main entrance of the citadel of Mycenae, 13th century BC

Main article: Helladic period

The Bronze Age in mainland Greece is generally termed as the « Helladic period » by modern archaeologists, after Hellas, the Greek name for Greece. This period is divided into three subperiods: The Early Helladic (EH) period (c. 2900–2000 BC) was a time of prosperity with the use of metals and a growth in technology, economy and social organization. The Middle Helladic (MH) period (ca. 2000–1650 BC) faced a slower pace of development, as well as the evolution of megaron-type dwellings and cist grave burials.^[1] Finally, the Late Helladic (LH) period (c. 1650–1050 BC) roughly coincides with Mycenaean Greece.^[1]

The Late Helladic period is further divided into LHI and LHII, both of which coincide with the early period of Mycenaean Greece (c. 1650–1425 BC), and LHIII (c. 1425–1050 BC), the period of expansion, decline and collapse of the Mycenaean civilization.^[1] The transition period from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in Greece is known as Sub-Mycenaean (c. 1050–1000 BC).^[1]

Two Mycenaean chariot warriors on a fresco from Pylos(about 1350 BC; left) and two female charioteers from Tiryns (1200 BC; right)

See also: Names of the Greeksand Achaeans (Homer)

The decipherment of the Mycenaean Linear B script, a writing system adapted for the use of the Greek language of the Late Bronze Age,^[11] demonstrated the continuity of Greek speech from the second millennium BC into the eighth century BC when a new script emerged. Moreover, it revealed that the bearers of Mycenaean culture were ethnically connected with the populations that resided in the Greek peninsula after the end of this cultural period.^[12] Various collective terms for the inhabitants of Mycenaean Greece were used by Homer in his 8th century BC epic, the Iliad, in reference to the Trojan War. The latter was supposed to have happened in the late 13th – early 12th century BC, when a coalition of small Greek states under the king of Mycenae, besieged the walled city of Troy. Homer used the ethnonyms Achaeans, Danaans and Argives, to refer to the besiegers.^[13]These names appear to have passed down from the time they were in use to the time when Homer applied them as collective terms in his Iliad.^[14] There is an isolated reference to a-ka-wi-ja-de in the Linear B records in Knossos, Crete dated to c. 1400 BC, which most probably refers to a Mycenaean (Achaean) state on the Greek mainland.^[15]

Egyptian records mention a T(D)-n-jor Danaya (Tanaju) land for the first time in circa 1437 BC, during the reign of Pharaoh Thutmoses III (r. 1479–1425 BC). This land is geographically defined in an inscription from the reign of Amenhotep III (r. circa 1390–1352 BC), where a number of Danaya cities are mentioned, which cover the largest part of southern mainland Greece.^[16] Among them, cities such as Mycenae, Nauplion and Thebes have been identified with certainty. Danaya has been equated with the ethnonym Danaoi(Greek: Δαναοί), the name of the mythical dynasty that ruled in the region of Argos, also used as an ethnonym for the Greek people by Homer.^[16][17]

In the official records of another Bronze Age empire, that of the Hittites in Anatolia, various references from c. 1400 BC to 1220 BC mention a country named Ahhiyawa.^[18][19] Recent scholarship, based on textual evidence, new interpretations of the Hittite inscriptions, as well as on recent surveys of archaeological evidence about Mycenaean-Anatolian contacts during this period, concludes that the term Ahhiyawa must have been used in reference to the Mycenaean world (land of the Achaeans), or at least to a part of it.^[20][21] This term may have also had broader connotations in some texts, possibly referring to all regions settled by Mycenaeans or regions under direct Mycenaean political control.^[18] Another similar ethnonym Ekwesh in twelfth century BC Egyptian inscriptions, has been commonly identified with the Ahhiyawans. These Ekwesh were mentioned as a group of the Sea People.^[22]

History

Shaft grave era (c. 1600–1450 BC)

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Death mask, known as the Mask of Agamemnon, Grave Circle A, Mycenae, 16th century BC, probably the most famous artifact of Mycenaean Greece.^[23]

Mycenaean civilization originated and evolved from the society and culture of the Early and Middle Helladic period in mainland Greece under influences from Minoan Crete.^[24] Towards the end of the Middle Bronze Age (c. 1600 BC) a significant increase in the population and the number of settlements occurred.^[25] A number of centers of power emerged in southern mainland Greece dominated by a warrior elite society,^[1][24] while the typical dwellings of that era were an early type of megaron buildings. Some more complex structures are classified as forerunners of the later palaces. In a number of sites, defensive walls were also erected.^[26]

Meanwhile, new types of burials and more imposing ones have been unearthed, which display a great variety of luxurious objects.^[25][27]Among the various burial types, the shaft grave became the most common form of elite burial, a feature that gave the name to the early period of Mycenaean Greece.^[25] Among the Mycenaean elite, deceased men were usually laid to rest in gold masks and funerary armor, and women in gold crowns and clothes gleaming with gold ornaments.^[28] The royal shaft graves next to the acropolis of Mycenae, in particular the Grave Circles A and B signified the elevation of a native Greek-speaking royal dynasty whose economic power depended on long-distance sea trade.^[29]

During this period, the Mycenaean centers witnessed increased contacts with the outside world and especially with the Cyclades and the Minoan centers in the island of Crete.^[1][25] Mycenaean presence appears to be also depicted in a fresco at Akrotiri, on Thera island, which possibly displays many warriors in Boar’s tusk helmets, a feature typical of Mycenaean warfare.^[30] In the early 15th century, commerce intensified with Mycenaean pottery reaching the western coast of Asia Minor, including Miletus and Troy, Cyprus, Lebanon, Palestine and Egypt.^[31]

At the end of the Shaft Grave era, a new and more imposing type of elite burial emerged, the Tholos: large circular burial chambers with high vaulted roofs and a straight entry passage lined with stone.^[32]

Koine era (c. 1450 BC–1250 BC)

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Fresco depicting a female figure in the acropolis of Mycenae, 13th century BC

The eruption of Thera, which according to archaeological data occurred in c. 1500 BC, resulted in the decline of the Minoan civilization of Crete.^[33] This turn of events gave the opportunity to the Mycenaeans to spread their influence throughout the Aegean. Around c. 1450 BC, they were in control of Crete itself, including Knossos, and colonized several other Aegean islands, reaching as far as Rhodes.^[34][35]Thus the Mycenaeans became the dominant power of the region, marking the beginning of the Mycenaean ‘Koine’ era (from Greek: Κοινή, common), a highly uniform culture that spread in mainland Greece and the Aegean.^[36]

From the early 14th century BC, Mycenaean trade began to take advantage of the new trading opportunities in the Mediterranean after the Minoan collapse.^[35] The trade routes were expanded further, reaching Cyprus, Amman in the Near East, Apulia in Italy and Spain.^[35] From that time period (c. 1400 BC), the palace of Knossos has yielded the earliest records of the Greek Linear B script, based on the previous Linear A of the Minoans. The use of the new script spread in mainland Greece and offers valuable insight into the administrative network of the palatial centers. However, the unearthed records are too fragmentary for a political reconstruction of Bronze Age Greece.^[37]

Mycenaean panoply, found in Dendra, Argolid, c.1400 BC

Excavations at Miletus, southwest Asia Minor, indicate the existence of a Mycenaean settlement there already from c. 1450 BC, replacing the previous Minoan installations.^[38] This site became a sizable and prosperous Mycenaean center until the 12th century BC.^[39] Apart from the archaeological evidence, this is also attested in Hittite records, which indicate that Miletos (Milawata in Hittite) was the most important base for Mycenaean activity in Asia Minor.^[40] Mycenaean presence also reached the adjacent sites of Iasusand Ephesus.^[41]

Meanwhile, imposing palaces were built in the main Mycenaean centers of the mainland. The earliest palace structures were megaron-type buildings, such as the Menelaion in Sparta, Lakonia.^[42] Palaces proper are datable from c. 1400 BC, when Cyclopean fortifications were erected at Mycenae and nearby Tiryns.^[1] Additional palaces were built in Midea and Pylos in Peloponnese, Athens, Eleusis, Thebes and Orchomenos in Central Greece and Iolcos, in Thessaly, the latter being the northernmost Mycenaean center. Knossos in Crete also became a Mycenaean center, where the former Minoan complex underwent a number of adjustments, including the addition of a throne room.^[43] These centers were based on a rigid network of bureaucracy where administrative competencies were classified into various sections and offices according to specialization of work and trades. At the head of this society was the king, known as wanax (Linear B: wa-na-ka) in Mycenaean Greek terms. All powers were vested in him, as the main landlord and spiritual and military leader. At the same time he was an entrepreneur and trader and was aided by a network of high officials.^[44]

Involvement in Asia Minor[edit]

The presence of Ahhiyawa in western Anatolia is mentioned in various Hittite accounts from c. 1400 to c. 1220 BC.^[40] Ahhiyawa is generally accepted as a Hittite translation of Mycenaean Greece (Achaeans in Homeric Greek), but a precise geographical definition of the term cannot be drawn from the texts.^[45] During this time, the kings of Ahhiyawa were evidently capable of dealing with their Hittite counterparts both on a diplomatic and military level.^[46] Moreover, Ahhiyawan activity was to interfere in Anatolian affairs, with the support of anti-Hittite uprisings or through local vassal rulers, which the Ahhiyawan king used as agents for the extension of his influence.^[47]

Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East during the 14th century BC; Mycenaean Greece in purple

In c. 1400 BC, Hittite records mention the military activities of an Ahhiyawan warlord, Attarsiya, a possible Hittite way of writing the Greek name Atreus, who attacked Hittite vassals in western Anatolia.^[48] Later, in c. 1315 BC, an anti-Hittite rebellion headed by Arzawa, a Hittite vassal state, received support from Ahhiyawa.^[49]Meanwhile, Ahhiyawa appears to be in control of a number of islands in the Aegean, an impression also supported by archaeological evidence.^[50] During the reign of the Hittite king Hattusili III (c. 1267–1237 BC), the king of Ahhiyawa is recognized as a « Great King » and of equal status with the other contemporary great Bronze Age rulers: the kings of Egypt, Babyloniaand Assyria.^[51] At that time, another anti-Hittite movement, led by Piyama-Radu, broke out and was supported by the king of Ahhiyawa.^[52] Piyama-Radu caused major unrest in the region of Wilusaand later invaded the island of Lesbos, which then passed into Ahhiyawan control.^[53]

The Hittite-Ahhiyawan confrontation in Wilusa, the Hittite name for Troy, may provide the historical foundation for the Trojan Wartradition.^[54] As a result of this instability, the Hittite king initiated correspondence in order to convince his Ahhiyawan counterpart to restore peace in the region. The Hittite record mentions a certain Tawagalawa, a possible Hittite translation for Greek Eteocles, as brother of the king of Ahhiyawa.^[53][55]

Collapse (c. 1250–1100 BC)

Initial decline and revival

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Marching soldiers observed by a female figure, in a krater of c. 1200 BC in Mycenae

In c. 1250 BC, the first wave of destruction apparently occurred in various centers of mainland Greece for reasons that cannot be identified by archaeologists. In Boeotia, Thebes was burned to the ground, around that year or slightly later. Nearby Orchomenos shared the same fate, while the Boeotian fortifications of Gla were deserted.^[56] In the Peloponnese, a number of buildings surrounding the citadel of Mycenae were attacked and burned.^[57]

These incidents appear to have prompted the massive strengthening and expansion of the fortifications in various sites. In some cases, arrangements were also made for the creation of subterranean passages which led to underground cisterns. Tiryns, Midea and Athens expanded their defences with new cyclopean-style walls.^[58] The extension program in Mycenae almost doubled the fortified area of the citadel. To this phase of extension belongs the impressive Lion Gate, the main entrance into the Mycenaean acropolis.^[58]

It appears that after this first wave of destruction a short-lived revival of Mycenaean culture followed.^[59]Mycenaean Greece continues to be mentioned in international affairs, particularly in Hittite records. In c. 1220 BC, the king of Ahhiyawa is again reported to have been involved in an anti-Hittite uprising in western Anatolia.^[60] Another contemporary Hittite account reports that Ahhiyawan ships should avoid Assyrian-controlled harbors, as part of a trade embargo imposed on Assyria.^[61] In general, in the second half of 13th century BC, trade was in decline in the Eastern Mediterranean, most probably due to the unstable political environment there.^[62]

Final collapse

None of the defence measures appear to have prevented the final destruction and collapse of the Mycenaean states. A second destruction struck Mycenae in ca. 1190 BC or shortly thereafter. This event marked the end of Mycenae as a major power. The site was then reoccupied, but on a smaller scale.^[57] The palace of Pylos, in the southwestern Peloponnese, was destroyed in c. 1180 BC.^[63][64] The Linear B archives found there, preserved by the heat of the fire that destroyed the palace, mention hasty defence preparations due to an imminent attack without giving any detail about the attacking force.^[59]

As a result of this turmoil, specific regions in mainland Greece witnessed a dramatic population decrease, especially Boeotia, Argolis and Messenia.^[59]Mycenaean refugees migrated to Cyprus and the Levantine coast.^[64]Nevertheless, other regions on the edge of the Mycenaean world prospered, such as the Ionian islands, the northwestern Peloponnese, parts of Attica and a number of Aegean islands.^[59] The acropolis of Athens, oddly, appears to have avoided destruction.^[59]

Hypotheses for the collapse

 Bronze Age collapseand Dorian Invasion

Invasions, destructions and possible population movements during the collapse of the Bronze Age, ca. 1200 BC

The reasons for the end of the Mycenaean culture have been hotly debated among scholars. At present, there is no satisfactory explanation for the collapse of the Mycenaean palace systems. The two most common theories are population movement and internal conflict. The first attributes the destruction of Mycenaean sites to invaders.^[65]

The hypothesis of a Dorian invasion, known as such in Ancient Greek tradition, that led to the end of Mycenaean Greece, is supported by sporadic archaeological evidence such as new types of burials, in particular cist graves, and the use of a new dialect of Greek, the Doricone. It appears that the Dorians moved southward gradually over a number of years and devastated the territory, until they managed to establish themselves in the Mycenaean centers.^[66] A new type of ceramic also appeared, called « Barbarian Ware » because it was attributed to invaders from the north.^[59] On the other hand, the collapse of Mycenaean Greece coincides with the activity of the Sea Peoples in the Eastern Mediterranean. They caused widespread destruction in Anatolia and the Levant and were finally defeated by Pharaoh Ramesses IIIin c. 1175 BC. One of the ethnic groups that comprised these people were the Eqwesh, a name that appears to be linked with the Ahhiyawa of the Hittite inscriptions.^[67]

Alternative scenarios propose that the fall of Mycenaean Greece was a result of internal disturbances which led to internecine warfare among the Mycenaean states or civil unrest in a number of states, as a result of the strict hierarchical social system and the ideology of the wanax.^[68] In general, due to the obscure archaeological picture in 12th-11th century BC Greece, there is a continuing controversy among scholars over whether the impoverished societies that succeeded the Mycenaean palatial states were newcomers or populations that already resided in Mycenaean Greece. Recent archaeological findings tend to favor the latter scenario.^[59] Additional theories, concerning natural factors, such as climate change, droughts or earthquakes have also been proposed.^[68] The period following the end of Mycenaean Greece, c. 1100-800 BC, is generally termed the « Greek Dark Ages« .^[69]

Political organization

Reconstruction of the political landscape in c. 1400-1250 BC mainland southern Greece

Mycenaean palatial states, or centrally organized palace-operating polities, are recorded in ancient Greek literature and mythology (e.g., Iliad, Catalogue of Ships) and confirmed by discoveries made by modern archaeologists such as Heinrich Schliemann. Each Mycenaean kingdom was governed from the palace, which exercised control over most, if not all, industries within its realm. The palatial territory was divided into several sub-regions, each headed by its provincial center.^[70] Each province was further divided in smaller districts, the da-mo.^[70] A number of palaces and fortifications appear to be part of a wider kingdom. For instance, Gla, located in the region of Boeotia, belonged to the state of nearby Orchomenos.^[56]Moreover, the palace of Mycenae appeared to have ruled over a territory two to three times the size of the other palatial states in Bronze Age Greece. Its territory would have also included adjacent centers, including Tiryns and Nauplion, which could plausibly be ruled by a member of Mycenae’s ruling dynasty.^[71]

The unearthed Linear B texts are too fragmentary for the reconstruction of the political landscape in Mycenaean Greece and they do not support the existence of a larger Mycenaean state.^[45][72] On the other hand, contemporary Hittite and Egyptian records suggest the presence of a single state under a « Great King ».^[73]Alternatively, based on archaeological data, some sort of confederation among a number of palatial states appears to be possible.^[45] If some kind of united political entity existed, the dominant center was probably located in Thebes or in Mycenae, with the latter state being the most probable center of power.^[74]

Society and administration

The Neolithic agrarian village (6000 BC) constituted the foundation of Bronze Age political culture in Greece.^[75] The vast majority of the preserved Linear B records deal with administrative issues and give the impression that Mycenaean palatial administration was highly uniform with the use of the same language, terminology, system of taxation and distribution.^[37][70] Considering this sense of uniformity, the Pylosarchive, which is the best preserved one in the Mycenaean world, is generally taken as a representative one.^[37]

The state was ruled by a king, the wanax (ϝάναξ), whose role was religious and perhaps also military and judicial.^[76] The wanax oversaw virtually all aspects of palatial life, from religious feasting and offerings to the distribution of goods, craftsmen and troops.^[77] Under him was the lāwāgetas (« the leader of the people »), whose role appears mainly religious. His activities possibly overlap with the wanax and is usually seen as the second-in-command.^[77] Both wanax and lāwāgetas were at the head of a military aristocracy known as the eqeta (« companions » or « followers »).^[76][78] The land possessed by the wanax is usually the témenos (te-me-no). There is also at least one instance of a person, Enkhelyawon, at Pylos, who appears titleless in the written record but whom modern scholars regard as probably a king.^[79]

A number of local officials positioned by the wanax appear to be in charge of the districts, such as ko-re-te(koreter, ‘ »governor »), po-ro-ko-re-te(prokoreter, « deputy ») and the da-mo-ko-ro (damokoros, « one who takes care of a damos »), the latter probably being appointed to take charge of the commune. A council of elders was chaired, the ke-ro-si-ja(cf. γερουσία, gerousía). The basileus, who in latter Greek society was the name of the king, refers to communal officials.^[76]

In general, Mycenaean society appears to have been divided into two groups of free men: the king’s entourage, who conducted administrative duties at the palace, and the people, da-mo^[80] These last were watched over by royal agents and were obliged to perform duties for and pay taxes to the palace.^[76]Among those who could be found in the palace were well-to-do high officials, who probably lived in the vast residences found in proximity to Mycenaean palaces, but also others, tied by their work to the palace and not necessarily better off than the members of the da-mo, such as craftsmen, farmers, and perhaps merchants. Occupying a lower rung of the social ladder were the slaves, do-e-ro, (cf. δοῦλος, doúlos).^[81] These are recorded in the texts as working either for the palace or for specific deities.^[76]

Economy

Mycenaean palace amphora, found in the Argolid

Mycenaean stirrup vase found in the acropolis of Ugarit, Eastern Mediterranean (c. 1400–1300 BC)

The Mycenaean economy, given its pre-monetary nature, was focused on the redistribution of goods, commodities and labor by a central administration. The preserved Linear B records in Pylos and Knossos indicate that the palaces were closely monitoring a variety of industries and commodities, the organization of land management and the rations given to the dependent personnel.^[82][83] The Mycenaean palaces maintained extensive control of the nondomestic areas of production through careful control and acquisition and distribution in the palace industries, and the tallying of produced goods.^[84][85] For instance, the Knossos tablets record c. 80,000-100,000 sheep grazing in central Crete, and the quantity of the expected wool from these sheep and their offspring, as well as how this wool was allocated.^[85] The archives of Pylos display a specialized workforce, where each worker belonged to a precise category and was assigned to a specific task in the stages of production, notably in textiles.^[86]

Nevertheless, palatial control over resources appears to have been highly selective in spatial terms and in terms of how different industries were managed.^[87] Thus, sectors like the production of perfumed oil and bronze materials were directly monitored from the palace, but the production of ceramics was only indirectly monitored.^[88] Regional transactions between the palaces are also recorded on a few occasions.^[89]

Large-scale infrastructure

The palatial centers organized their workforce and resources for the construction of large scale projects in the fields of agriculture and industry.^[83] The magnitude of some projects indicates that this was the result of combined efforts from multiple palatial centers. Most notable of them are the drainage system of the Kopais basin in Boeotia, the building of a large dam outside Tiryns, and the drainage of the swamp in the Nemea valley.^[90]Also noticeable is the construction of harbors, such as the harbor of Pylos, that were capable of accommodating large Bronze Age era vessels like the one found at Uluburun.^[90] The Mycenaean economy also featured large-scale manufacturing as testified by the extent of workshop complexes that have been discovered, the largest known to date being the recent ceramic and hydraulic installations found in Euonymeia, next to Athens, that produced tableware, textiles, sails, and ropes for export and shipbuilding.^[91]

The most famous project of the Mycenaean era was the network of roads in the Peloponnese.^[90] This appears to have facilitated the speedy deployment of troops—for example, the remnants of a Mycenaean road, along with what appears to have been a Mycenaean defensive wall on the Isthmus of Corinth. The Mycenaean era saw the zenith of infrastructure engineering in Greece, and this appears not to have been limited to the Argive plain.^[92]

Trade

Gold earring, ca. 1600 BC, Louvre Museum

Reconstruction of a Mycenaean ship

Trade over vast areas of the Mediterranean was essential for the economy of Mycenaean Greece.^[83]The Mycenaean palaces imported raw materials, such as metals, ivory and glass, and exported processed commodities and objects made from these materials, in addition to local products: oil, perfume, wine, wool and pottery.^[83] International trade of that time was not only conducted by palatial emissaries but also by independent merchants.^[93]

Based on archaeological findings in the Middle East, in particular physical artifacts, textual references, inscriptions and wall paintings, it appears that Mycenaean Greeks achieved strong commercial and cultural interaction with most of the Bronze Age people living in this region: Canaanites, Kassites, Mitanni, Assyrians, and Egyptians.^[93][94][95] The 14th century Uluburun shipwreck, off the coast of southern Anatolia, displays the established trade routes that supplied the Mycenaeans with all the raw materials and items that the economy of Mycenaean Greece needed, such as copper and tin for the production of bronze products.^[96] A chief export of the Mycenaeans was olive oil, which was a multi-purpose product.^[97]

Cyprus appears to be the principal intermediary station between Mycenaean Greece and the Middle East, based on the considerable greater quantities of Mycenaean goods found there.^[98] On the other hand, trade with the Hittite lands in central Anatolia appears to have been limited.^[93][99] Trade with Troyis also well attested, while Mycenaean trade routes expanded further to the Bosphorus and the shores of the Black Sea.^[100]Mycenaean swords have been found as far away as Georgia in the eastern Black Sea coast.^[101]

Commercial interaction was also intense with the Italian peninsula and the western Mediterranean. Mycenaean products, especially pottery, were exported to southern Italy, Sicily and the Aeolian islands. Mycenaean products also penetrated further into Sardinia,^[102][103] as well as southern Spain.^[104]

Sporadic objects of Mycenaean manufacture were found in various distant locations, like in Central Europe,^[105] such as in Bavaria, Germany, where an amber object inscribed with Linear B symbols has been unearthed.^[106] Mycenaean bronze double axes and other objects dating from the 13th century BC have been found in Ireland and in Wessex and Cornwall in England.^[107][108]

Religion

 Mycenaean religionand List of Mycenaean gods

The Lady of Phylakopi; wheel-made pottery figurine of a goddess or priestess from the West Shrine in Phylakopi; late Helladic III A period, 14th century BC, Archaeological Museum of Milos

Temples and shrines are strangely rare in the Mycenaean archaeological sites. Monumental cultic structures are absent at all the palatial centers, with the exception of Mycenae. However, the cultic center of Mycenae seems to have been a later (13th century BC) development.^[109] Small shrines have been identified in Asine, Berbati, Malthi and Pylos,^[110] while a number of sacred enclosures have been located near Mycenae, Delphiand Amyklae.^[111] Linear B records mention a number of sanctuaries dedicated to a variety of deities, at least in Pylos and Knossos. They also indicate that there were various religious festivities including offerings.^[112] Written Mycenaean records mention various priests and priestesses who were responsible for specific shrines and temples.^[113]The latter were prominent figures in society, and the role of Mycenaean women in religious festivities was also important, just as in MinoanCrete.^[114]

The Mycenaean pantheon already included many divinities that were subsequently encountered in Classical Greece,^[115] although it is difficult to determine whether these deities had the characteristics and responsibilities that would be attributed to them in later periods.^[116] In general, the same divinities were worshipped throughout the Mycenaean palatial world. There may be some indications for local deities at various sites, in particular in Crete. The uniformity of Mycenaean religion is also reflected in archaeological evidence with the phi- and psi-figurines that have been found all over Late Bronze Age Greece.^[109]

Poseidon (Linear B: Po-se-da-o) seems to have occupied a place of privilege. He was a chthonic deity, connected with earthquakes (E-ne-si-da-o-ne: Earth-shaker), but it seems that he also represented the river spirit of the underworld.^[117]Paean (Pa-ja-wo) is probably the precursor of the Greek physician of the gods in Homer’s Iliad. He was the personification of the magic-song which was supposed to « heal » the patient.^[118] A number of divinities have been identified in the Mycenaean scripts only by their epithets used during later antiquity. For example, Qo-wi-ja (« cow-eyed ») is a standard Homeric ephithet of Hera.^[119] Ares appeared under the name Enyalios (assuming that Enyalios is not a separate god).^[120]Additional divinities that can be also found in later periods include Hephaestus, Erinya, Artemis (a-te-mi-to and a-ti-mi-te) and Dionysos(Di-wo-nu-so).^{[121][122][123][124]} Zeusalso appears in the Mycenaean pantheon, but he was certainly not the chief deity.^[116]

A collection of « ladies » or « mistresses », Po-ti-ni-ja (Potnia) are named in the Mycenaean scripts. As such, Athena (A-ta-na) appears in an inscription at Knossos as mistress Athena, similar to a later Homeric expression, but in the Pylos tablets she is mentioned without any accompanying word.^[125] Si-to po-ti-ni-ja appears to be an agricultural goddess, possibly related to Demeter of later antiquity,^[119] while in Knossos there is the « mistress of the Labyrinth ».^[126] The « two queens and the king » (wa-na-ssoi, wa-na-ka-te) are mentioned in Pylos.^[127][128]Goddess Pe-re-swa mentioned may be related to Persephone.^[119][125] A number of Mycenaean divinities seem to have no later equivalents, such as Marineus, Diwia and Komawenteia.^[116]

Architecture

Palaces

Tiryns, map of the palace and the surrounding fortifications

The palatial structures at Mycenae, Tiryns and Pylos were erected on the summits of hills or rocky outcrops, dominating the immediate surroundings.^[129] The best preserved are found in Pylos and Tiryns, while Mycenae and the Menelaion are only partially preserved. In Central Greece, Thebes and Orchomenos have been only partially exposed. On the other hand, the palace built at the acropolis of Athens has been almost completely destroyed. A substantial building at Dimini in Thessaly, possibly ancient Iolcos,^[130] is believed by a number of archaeologists to be a palace.^[129] A Mycenaean palace has been also unearthed in Laconia, near the modern village of Xirokambi.^[131]

The hearth of the megaron of Pylos

The palatial structures of mainland Greece share a number of common features.^[132] The focal point of the socio-political aspect of a Mycenaean palace was the megaron, the throne room.^[129] It was laid out around a circular hearth surrounded by four columns. The throne was generally found on the right-hand side upon entering the room, while the interior of the megaron was lavishly decorated, flaunting images designed intentionally to demonstrate the political and religious power of the ruler.^[133] Access to the megaron was provided through a court, which was reached from a propylon.^[132]The iconography of the palatial chambers is remarkably uniform throughout Greece. For instance, in Pylos and Tiryns the paintings are focused on marine motifs, providing depictions of octopi, fish and dolphins.^[134] Around the megaron a group of courtyards each opened upon several rooms of different dimensions, such as storerooms and workshops, as well as reception halls and living quarters.^[132] In general Mycenaean palaces have yielded a wealth of artifacts and fragmentary frescoes.^[132]

Additional common features are shared by the palaces of Pylos, Mycenae and Tiryns;^[132] a large court with colonnades lies directly in front of the central megaron,^[135]while a second, but smaller, megaron is also found inside these structures.^[132] The staircases in the palace of Pylos indicate that the palaces had two stories.^[136] The private quarters of the members of the royal family were presumably located on the second floor.^[137]

Fortifications

Cyclopean masonry in the southern walls of Mycenae

The construction of defensive structures was closely linked to the establishment of the palaces in mainland Greece. The principal Mycenaean centers were well-fortified and usually situated on an elevated terrain, like on the acropolis of Athens, Tiryns and Mycenae or on coastal plains, in the case of Gla.^[138] Mycenaean Greeks in general appreciated the symbolism of war as expressed in defensive architecture, reflected by the visual impressiveness of their fortifications.^[138]

Giacobbe Giusti, Mycenaean Greece

Part of the galleries within the walls of Tiryns

Cyclopean is the term normally applied to the masonry characteristics of Mycenaean fortification systems and describes walls built of large, unworked boulders more than 8 m (26 ft) thick and weighing several metric tonnes.^[139] They were roughly fitted together without the use of mortar or clay to bind them, though smaller hunks of limestone fill the interstices. Their placement formed a polygonal pattern giving the curtain wall an irregular but imposing appearance.^[140] At the top it would have been wide enough for a walkway with a narrow protective parapet on the outer edge and with hoop-like crenellations.^[140] The term Cyclopean was derived by the latter Greeks of the Classical era who believed that only the mythical giants, the Cyclopes, could have constructed such megalithic structures.^[138] On the other hand, cut stone masonry is used only in and around gateways.^[140] Another typical feature of Mycenaean megalithic construction was the use of a relieving triangle above a lintel block—an opening, often triangular, designed to reduce the weight over the lintel. The space was filled with some lighter stone.^[140]

Cyclopean fortifications were typical of Mycenaean walls, especially at the citadels of Mycenae, Tiryns, Argos, Crisa and Athens, while smaller boulders are found in Mideaand large limestone slabs are found at Gla.^[140] In the Mycenaean settlements found in Epirus and Cyprus, Cyclopean-style walls are also present,^[141][142] as well as in western Anatolia.^[143] Besides the citadels, isolated forts were also erected on various strategic locations. The fortification systems also incorporated technical refinements such as secret cisterns, galleries, sally ports and projecting bastions for the protection of gateways.^[138] On the other hand, the palace of Pylos, although a major center of power, paradoxically appears to have been left without any defensive walls.^[144]

Other architectural features

Mycenaean domestic architecture originates mainly from earlier Middle Helladic traditions (c. 2000–1650 BC) both in shape, as well as in location of settlement. The observed uniformity in domestic architecture came probably as a result of a shared past among the communities of the Greek mainland rather than as a consequence of cultural expansion of the Mycenaean Koine.^[42] Moreover, varying sizes of mudbricks were used in the construction of buildings.^[132]

Contrary to popular belief, some Mycenaean representative buildings already featured roofs made of fired tiles, as in Gla and Midea.^[145]

Warfare

Main article: Military of Mycenaean Greece

The military nature of the Mycenaean Greeks is evident from the numerous weapons unearthed, the use of warrior and combat representations in contemporary art, and the preserved Greek Linear Brecords.^[146][147] The Mycenaeans invested in the development of military infrastructure, with military production and logistics being supervised directly from the palatial centers.^[147][148] According to the Linear B records in the palace of Pylos, every rural community (the damos) was obliged to supply a certain number of men who had to serve in the army. Similar service was also performed by the aristocracy.^[149]

Replicas of Mycenaean swords and cups

Mycenaean armies were initially based on heavy infantry, equipped with spears, large shields and in some occasion armor.^[150] Later in the 13th century BC, Mycenaean warfare underwent major changes both in tactics and weaponry and armed units became more uniform and flexible, while weapons became smaller and lighter.^[147] The spear remained the main weapon among Mycenaean warriors, while the sword played a secondary role in combat.^[151] Other offensive weapons used were bows, maces, axes, slings and javelins.^[151][152]The precise role and contribution of chariots on the battlefield is a matter of dispute due to the lack of sufficient evidence.^[153] It appears that chariots were initially used as fighting vehicles during the 16th to 14th centuries BC, while later, in the 13th century BC, their role was limited to battlefield transport.^[154]

The boar’s tusk helmet was the most identifiable piece of Mycenaean armor in use from the beginning to the collapse of Mycenaean culture. It is also known from several depictions in contemporary art in Greece and the Mediterranean.^[155][156] A representative piece of Mycenaean armor is the Dendra panoply (c. 1450–1400 BC) which consisted of a cuirass of a complete set of armor made up of several elements of bronze.^[157] In general, most features of the later hoplite panoplyof classical Greek antiquity, were already known to Mycenaean Greece.^[158] « Figure-of-eight » shields were the most common type of Mycenaean shields.^[159] During the Late Mycenaean period, smaller types of shields were adopted, either of completely circular shape, or almost circular with a part cut out from their lower edge.^[160]

Art and craftwork

Vessels

 Mycenaean pottery

Silver repoussé rhyton with gold horns, from Grave Circle A at Mycenae, 16th century BC (Archaeological Museum, Athens)

During the Late Mycenaean period (1400–1200 BC), Mycenaean vessels/pottery exhibited similarities spanning a significant area of the Eastern Mediterranean (i.e., from the Levant to Sicily) and possibly reflecting a form of economic and political union centered at Mycenae.^[161] However, the pottery of Crete during this time remained distinct indicating a degree of autonomy on the island.^[161] The Mycenaean Greeks produced in large quantities a variety of diversely-styled vessels such as stirrup jars, large bowls, alabastron, krater and stemmed cups (or kylikes) resembling champagne glasses.^[161]

Stirrup jars (Linear B: ka-ra-re-u, khlareus; « oil vessel »), specifically, were first invented on the island of Crete during the 16th century BC and used widely by the Mycenaeans from 1400 BC onward for transporting and storing wine and oil; the jars were usually pear-shaped or globular.^[161] As for stemmed cups (or kylikes), they evolved from Ephyraean goblets and a large quantity was discovered at a site called the « Potter’s Shop » located in Zygouries.^[161]Mycenaean drinking vessels such as the stemmed cups contained single decorative motifs such as a shell, an octopus or a flower painted on the side facing away from the drinker.^[161] The Mycenaean Greeks also painted entire scenes (called « Pictorial Style ») on their vessels depicting warriors, chariots, horses and deities reminiscent of events described in Homer’s Iliad.^[162]Other items developed by the Mycenaeans include clay lamps,^[163]as well as metallic vessels such as bronze tripod cauldrons (or basins).^[164] A few examples of vessels in faience and ivory are also known.^[165]

Figures and figurines

The Mycenaean period has not yielded sculpture of any great size. The statuary of the period consists for the most part of small terracotta figurines found at almost every Mycenaean site in mainland Greece—in tombs, in settlement debris, and occasionally in cult contexts (Tiryns, Agios Konstantinos on Methana). The majority of these figurines are female and anthropomorphic or zoomorphic. The female figurines can be subdivided into three groups which were popular at different periods: the earliest are the Phi-type, which look like the Greek letter phi and their arms give the upper body of the figurine a rounded shape. The Psi-type looks like the letter Greek psi: these have outstretched upraised arms. The latest (12th century BC) are the Tau-type: these figurines look like the Greek letter tau with folded(?) arms at right angles to the body. Most figurines wear a large ‘polos’ hat.^[166] They are painted with stripes or zigzags in the same manner as the contemporary pottery and presumably made by the same potters. Their purpose is uncertain, but they may have served as both votive objects and toys: some are found in children’s graves but the vast majority of fragments are from domestic rubbish deposits.^[167] The presence of many of these figurines on sites where worship took place in the Archaic and Classical periods (approximately 200 below the sanctuary of Athena at Delphi, others at the temple of Aphaea on Aegina, at the sanctuary of Apollo Maleatas above Epidauros and at Amyklae near Sparta), suggests both that many were indeed religious in nature, perhaps as votives, but also that later places of worship may well have first been used in the Mycenaean period.^[168]

Larger male, female or bovine terracotta wheelmade figures are much rarer. An important group was found in the Temple at Mycenae together with coiled clay snakes,^[169]while others have been found at Tiryns and in the East and West Shrines at Phylakopi on the island of Melos.^[170]

Frescoes

Fresco of a Mycenaean woman

The painting of the Mycenaean age was much influenced by that of the Minoan age. Fragments of wall paintings have been found in or around the palaces (Pylos, Mycenae, Tiryns) and in domestic contexts (Zygouries).^[171] The largest complete wall painting depicting three female figures, probably goddesses, was found in the so-called « cult center » at Mycenae.^[172] Various themes are represented: hunting, bull leaping(tauromachy), battle scenes, processions, etc. Some scenes may be part of mythological narratives, but if so their meaning eludes us. Other frescoes include geometric or stylised motifs, also used on painted pottery (see above).

Burial practices

The usual form of burial during this period was inhumation.^[173] The earliest Mycenaean burials were mostly in individual graves in the form of a pit or a stone-lined cist and offerings were limited to pottery and occasional items of jewellery.^[174]Groups of pit or cist graves containing elite members of the community were sometimes covered by a tumulus (mound) in the manner established since the Middle Helladic.^[175] It has been argued that this form dates back to the Kurgan culture;^[176] however, Mycenaean burials are in actuality an indigenous development of mainland Greece with the Shaft Graves housing native rulers.^[177] Pit and cist graves remained in use for single burials throughout the Mycenaean period alongside more elaborate family graves.^[178] The shaft graves at Mycenae within Grave Circles A and B belonging to the same period represent an alternative manner of grouping elite burials. Next to the deceased were found full sets of weapons, ornate staffs as well as gold and silver cups and other valuable objects which point to their social rank.^[179]

Treasury of Atreus, 13th century BC royal tholos tomb near Mycenae: exterior (left) and interior (right) view.

Beginning also in the Late Helladic period are to be seen communal tombs of rectangular form. Nevertheless, it is difficult to establish whether the different forms of burial represent a social hierarchization, as was formerly thought, with the « tholos » being the tombs of the elite rulers, the individual tombs those of the leisure class, and the communal tombs those of the people. Cremations increased in number over the course of the period, becoming quite numerous in the last phase of the Mycenaean era.^[180] The tholos was introduced during the early 15th century as the new and more imposing form of elite burial.^[181] The most impressive tombs of the Mycenaean era are the monumental royal tombs of Mycenae, undoubtedly intended for the royal family of the city. The most famous is the Treasury of Atreus, a tholos. A total of nine of such tholos tombs are found in the region of Mycenae, while six of them belong to a single period (Late Helladic IIa, c. 1400-1300 BC).^[182] It has been argued that different dynasties or factions may have competed through conspicuous burial.^[183]

Writing

Linear B

Linear B tablets (Mycenaean Greek)

In circa 1600 BC, the Mycenaean Greeks borrowed from the Minoan civilization its syllabic writing system (i.e., Linear A) and developed their own syllabic script known as Linear B.^[184] The Linear B script was utilized by the Mycenaean palaces in Greece for administrative purposes where economic transactions were recorded on clay tablets and some pottery in the Mycenaean dialect of the Greek language.^[184] The Linear B tablets were first discovered in Crete by English archaeologist Sir Arthur Evans c. 1900 and later deciphered by English architect and cryptographer Michael Ventris in 1952.^[185][186] Ventris’s discovery of an archaic Greek dialect in the Linear B tablets demonstrated that Mycenaean Greek was « the oldest known Greek dialect, elements of which survived in Homer’s language as a result of a long oral tradition of epic poetry. »^[184]

Legacy

In the 8th century BC, after the end of the so-called Greek Dark Ages, Greece emerged with a network of myths and legends, the greatest of all being that of the Trojan Epic Cycle.^[187] In general, the Greeks of classical antiquity idealized the Mycenaean period as a glorious period of heroes, closeness of the gods and material wealth.^[188] The legends of Homer‘s Epics were especially and generally accepted as part of the Greek past and it was not until the 19th century that scholars began to question Homer’s historicity.^[187] At this time, German archaeologist Heinrich Schliemannundertook the first modern archaeological excavations in Greece at the site of Mycenae in 1876.^[189] Thus, Schliemann set out to prove the historical accuracy of the Iliad by identifying the places described by Homer.^[187]

As part of the Mycenaean heritage that survived, the names of the gods and goddesses of Mycenaean Greece became major figures of the Olympian Pantheon of later antiquity.^[190] Moreover, the language of the Mycenaeans offers the first written evidence of Greek,^[191] while a significant part of the Mycenaean vocabulary can also be found in modern English.^[192]

The Mycenaean Greeks were also pioneers in the field of engineering, launching large-scale projects unmatched in Europe until the Roman period, such as fortifications, bridges, culverts, aqueducts, dams and roads suitable for wheeled traffic. They also made several architectural innovations, such as the relieving triangle.^[193] They were also responsible for transmitting a wide range of arts and crafts, especially of Minoan origin. The Mycenaean civilization was in general more advanced compared to the Late Bronze Age cultures of the rest of Europe.^[194] Several Mycenaean attributes and achievements were borrowed or held in high regard in later periods; so, it would be no exaggeration to consider Mycenaean Greece as a cradle of civilization.^[193]

• Archaeological Museum of Chora
• Mycenaean language
• Aegean civilizations

References

Citations

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h} Fields 2004, pp. 10–11.
2. Jump up^ Hammond 1976, p. 139: « Moreover, in this area a small tholos-tomb with Mycenaean pottery of III B style and a Mycenaean acropolis have been reported at Kiperi near Parga, and another Mycenaean acropolis lay above the Oracle of the Dead on the hill called Xylokastro. »
3. Jump up^ Tandy 2001, p. xii (Fig. 1); p. 2: « The strongest evidence for Mycenaean presence in Epirus is found in the coastal zone of the lower Acheron River, which in antiquity emptied into a bay on the Ionian coast known from ancient sources as Glykys Limin(Figure 2-A). »
4. Jump up^ Borza 1992, p. 64: « The existence of a Late Bronze Age Mycenaean settlement in the Petra not only confirms its importance as a route from an early period, but also extends the limits of Mycenaean settlement to the Macedonian frontier. »
5. Jump up^ Aegeo-Balkan Prehistory – Mycenaean Sites
6. Jump up^ van Wijngaarden 2002, Part II: The Levant, pp. 31–124; Bietak & Czerny 2007, Sigrid Deger-Jalkotzy, « Mycenaeans and Philistines in the Levant », pp. 501–629.
7. Jump up^ van Wijngaarden 2002, Part III: Cyprus, pp. 125–202.
8. Jump up^ Peruzzi 1980; van Wijngaarden 2002, Part IV: The Central Mediterranean, pp. 203–260.
9. Jump up^ Morris 1996, « Greece: Dark Age Greece », pp. 253–256.
10. Jump up^ The extent to which Homer attempted to or succeeded in recreating a « Mycenaean » setting is examined in Moses I. FinleyThe World of Odysseus, 1954.
11. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, p. 617.
12. Jump up^ Latacz 2004, pp. 159, 165.
13. Jump up^ Latacz 2004, p. 120.
14. Jump up^ Latacz 2004, p. 138.
15. Jump up^ Hajnal & Posch 2009, pp. 1–2.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, pp. 46–47.
17. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 37–38; Latacz 2004, p. 159.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Beckman, Bryce & Cline 2012, p. 4.
19. Jump up^ Latacz 2004, p. 123.
20. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 58.
21. Jump up^ Latacz 2004, p. 122.
22. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 357.
23. Jump up^ Burns 2010, p. 92: « The most famous object from Shaft Grave V, if not all of Mycenaean Greece, is the gold mask popularly known as the « mask of Agamemnon ». »
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b Dickinson 1977, pp. 32, 53, 107–108; Dickinson 1999, pp. 97–107.
25. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Schofield 2006, p. 31.
26. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 51.
27. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 48.
28. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 32.
29. Jump up^ Dickinson 1977, pp. 53, 107.
30. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 67.
31. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, pp. 64–68.
32. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 97; Schofield 2006, p. 55.
33. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, p. 12.
34. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 28.
35. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Schofield 2006, pp. 71–72.
36. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 75.
37. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Kelder 2010, p. 8.
38. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 21.
39. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 50, 52.
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bryce 2005, p. 361.
41. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 194: « The Mycenaean colonies in Anatolia were emphatically confined to a narrow coastal strip in the west. There were community-colonies at Ephesus, Iasos and Miletus, but they had little effect on the interior… »
42. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, p. 107.
43. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 108–109.
44. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 11; Fields 2004, p. 53.
45. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Beckman, Bryce & Cline 2012, p. 6.
46. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 119–120.
47. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 59; Kelder 2010, p. 23.
48. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, pp. 129, 368.
49. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 193.
50. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 26.
51. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 58; Kelder 2010, pp. 119–120.
52. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 224.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, p. 27.
54. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, pp. 361, 364.
55. Jump up^ Bryce 2005, p. 290.
56. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, p. 34.
57. ^ Jump up to:^a b Cline 2014, p. 130.
58. ^ Jump up to:^a b Castleden 2005, p. 219.
59. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g} Freeman 2014, p. 126.
60. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 33.
61. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 32.
62. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 20.
63. Jump up^ Cline 2014, p. 129.
64. ^ Jump up to:^a b Tartaron 2013, p. 18.
65. Jump up^ Mylonas 1966, pp. 227–228.
66. Jump up^ Mylonas 1966, pp. 231–232.
67. Jump up^ Drews 1993, p. 49.
68. ^ Jump up to:^a b Tartaron 2013, p. 19.
69. Jump up^ Freeman 2014, p. 127.
70. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Kelder 2010, p. 9.
71. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 97.
72. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 8–9.
73. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 45, 86, 107.
74. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, pp. 86–87.
75. Jump up^ Thomas 1995, p. 350.
76. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Chadwick 1976, Chapter 5: Social Structure and Administrative System, pp. 69–83.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, p. 11.
78. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 57
79. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, pp. 71–72.
80. Jump up^ δῆμος. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project.
81. Jump up^ δοῦλος. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project
82. Jump up^ Olsen 2014, p. 7.
83. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Cline 2012, p. 145.
84. Jump up^ Cline 2012, p. 242.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Budin 2009, p. 94.
86. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, p. 152.
87. Jump up^ Olsen 2014, p. 6.
88. Jump up^ Budin 2009, p. 96.
89. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 24.
90. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Kelder 2010, p. 116.
91. Jump up^ Gilstrap, William; Day, Peter; Kaza, Konstantina; Kardamaki, Elina (9 May 2013). Pottery Production at the Late Mycenaean site of Alimos, Attica. Materials and Industries in the Mycenaean World: Current Approaches to the Study of Materials and Industries in Prehistoric Greece, University of Nottingham, 9–10 May 2013(PDF). Nottingham, UK. pp. 13–14.
92. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 117.
93. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Cline 2007, p. 200.
94. Jump up^ Stubbings 1951, IV: Mycenaean II Pottery in Syria and Palestine; V: Mycenaean III Pottery in Syria and Palestine.
95. Jump up^ Petrie 1894.
96. Jump up^ Cline 2012, pp. 300, 387, 787.
97. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 107: « Huge quantities of olive oil were produced and it must have been a major source of wealth. The simple fact that southern Greece is far more suitable climatically for olive production may explain why the Mycenaean civilization made far greater advances in the south than in the north. The oil had a variety of uses, in cooking, as a dressing, as soap, as lamp oil, and as a base for manufacturing unguents. »
98. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 29; Kling 1989; Nikolaou 1973; International Archaeological Symposium 1973.
99. Jump up^ Cline 2007, p. 197.
100. Jump up^ Cline 2007, p. 196.
101. Jump up^ Boston University – The Historical Society.
102. Jump up^ Tartaron 2013, p. 22; Feuer 2004, pp. 155–157; Balmuth & Tykot 1998, « The Mycenaeans in Sardinia », p. 400; Runnels & Murray 2001, p. 15.
103. Jump up^ Ridgway 1992, p. 4; Taylour 1958; Fisher 1998; Runnels & Murray 2001, p. 15; Vianello 2005, « Eastern Sicily and the Aeolian Islands », p. 51; Feuer 2004, pp. 155–157; van Wijngaarden 2002, Part IV: The Central Mediterranean, pp. 203-260.
104. Jump up^ de la Cruz 1988, pp. 77–92; Ridgway 1992, p. 3; Runnels & Murray 2001, p. 15.
105. Jump up^ Castleden 2005.
106. Jump up^ « Amber object bearing Linear B symbols » (in German). Freising. 1999. Archived from the original on August 30, 2016. Retrieved February 9, 2018.
107. Jump up^ Budin 2009, p. 53: « One of the most extraordinary examples of the extent of Mycenaean influence was the Pelynt Dagger, a fragment of a Late Helladic III sword, which has come to light in the tomb of a Wessex chieftain in southern England! »
108. Jump up^ Feuer 2004, p. 259.
109. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kelder 2010, p. 115.
110. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 146.
111. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 157.
112. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 114.
113. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 144.
114. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 160.
115. Jump up^ Paul, Adams John (10 January 2010). « Mycenaean Divinities ». Northridge, CA: California State University. Retrieved 25 September 2013.
116. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Castleden 2005, p. 143.
117. Jump up^ Nilsson 1940.
118. Jump up^ Nilsson 1967, Volume I, pp. 500–504; Chadwick 1976, p. 88: « Pa-ja-wo suggested Homeric Paieon, which earlier would have been Paiawon, later Paidn, an alternative name of Apollo, if not again a separate god. »
119. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Chadwick 1976, p. 95
120. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, pp. 95, 99.
121. Jump up^ Nilsson 1967, Volume I, pp. 565–568.
122. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, p. 99.
123. Jump up^ Chadwick & Baumbach 1963, p. 176f.
124. Jump up^ Kn V 52 (text 208 in Ventris and Chadwick); Chadwick 1976, p. 88.
125. ^ Jump up to:^a b Mylonas 1966, p. 159.
126. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, pp. 92–93.
127. Jump up^ Mylonas 1966, p. 159: « Wa-na-ssoi, wa-na-ka-te, (to the two queens and the king). Wanax is best suited to Poseidon, the special divinity of Pylos. The identity of the two divinities addressed as wanassoi, is uncertain. »
128. Jump up^ Chadwick 1976, p. 76.
129. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Fields 2004, p. 19
130. Jump up^ Cline 2012, p. 485
131. Jump up^ Ταράντου, Σοφία (28 April 2009). « Βρήκαν μυκηναϊκό ανάκτορο ». Ethnos.gr. Retrieved 25 September 2013.
132. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g} Kelder 2010, p. 109
133. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 21
134. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 110
135. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 20.
136. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 45
137. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 46
138. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Fields 2004, p. 10.
139. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 78.
140. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Fields 2004, p. 11.
141. Jump up^ Tandy 2001, p. 20: « In LH IBBB (ca. 1310-1190), Mycenaean material culture spread widely throughout coastal and inland Epirus; in this period Mycenaean engagement in Epirus was strongest, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Though the Kiperi tholos may have gone out of use early in LH IIIB, the Cyclopean wall found there, as well as those at Ephyra, Kastriza, and Ayia Eleni, cannot have been built (and probably after) LH IIIB. »
142. Jump up^ Iacovou 2013, p. 610. Iacovou quotes Vassos Karageorghis who states that « The introduction of ‘Cyclopean’-type walls at the very beginning of the LC IIIA period at Enkomi, Kition, Sinda and Maa-Palaeokastron was due to the arrival of Mycenaean settlers in Cyprus. »
143. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 127.
144. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 44.
145. Jump up^ Wikander 1990, p. 288; Shear 2000, p. 134.
146. Jump up^ Cline 2012, p. 305.
147. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Cline 2012, p. 313.
148. Jump up^ Palaima 1999, pp. 367–368.
149. Jump up^ D’Amato & Salimbeti 2011, p. 10.
150. Jump up^ Howard 2011, p. 7.
151. ^ Jump up to:^a b Howard 2011, p. 50.
152. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 306; D’Amato & Salimbeti 2011, p. 13.
153. Jump up^ Howard 2011, p. 63.
154. Jump up^ Fields 2004, p. 22.
155. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 119.
156. Jump up^ D’Amato & Salimbeti 2011, p. 23.
157. Jump up^ D’Amato & Salimbeti 2011, p. 27.
158. Jump up^ Kagan & Viggiano 2013, p. 36: « In fact, most of the essential items of the « hoplite panoply » were known to Mycenaean Greece, including the metallic helmet and the single thrusting spear. »
159. Jump up^ D’Amato & Salimbeti 2011, p. 20.
160. Jump up^ Cline 2012, p. 312; Schofield 2006, p. 123.
161. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Castleden 2005, p. 135.
162. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, pp. 135–137: « Large kraters decorated in Pictorial Style are found almost exclusively in Cyprus, and for a long time it was naturally assumed that they were manufactured there, but a few examples have been found on the Greek mainland, mostly near Mycenae, and it has now been established that they were all manufactured at workshops close to Mycenae, probably at Berbati just to the east of the city, where there are the right clay sources. The ware was probably specifically made for export to Cyprus, where they were used as centerpieces for drinking ceremonies. The decoration appears to have been painted on at high speed and the effect is sometimes crude; Reynold Higgins calls it ‘barbarous’, which is a fair description, but the scenes showing warriors, horses and chariots can still tell us much about everyday life in Mycenaean Greece, and as much again about Mycenaean religious beliefs and mythology. One krater from Enkomi in Cyprus shows a charioteer with his groom riding along, perhaps into battle, while a long-robed god, Zeus perhaps, stands in his way holding the scales of destiny that will decide his fate. It is an archetypal scene reminiscent of several in the Iliad, where the gods are shown intervening in battle and deciding the outcome. »
163. Jump up^ Furumark 1941, p. 78: « There are two types of Mycenaean lamps. One of these (type 321) has a broad horizontal lip with two opposite depressions for wicks. This type is the clay version of a Minoan stone lamp, known in many examples both from Crete and from the Mainland. The other (type 321 a) has one wick-spout and a handle at the opposite side. »
164. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, pp. 56, 166.
165. Jump up^ Schofield 2006, p. 107.
166. Jump up^ French 1971, pp. 101–187
167. Jump up^ See account of their use in K.A. and Diana Wardle « The Child’s Cache at Assiros, Macedonia », in Sally Crawford and Gillian Shepherd (eds): Children, Childhood and Society: Institute for Archaeology and Antiquity Interdisciplinary Studies (Volume I) Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007.
168. Jump up^ Hägg & Marinatos 1981, Robin Hägg, « Official and Popular Cults in Mycenaean Greece », pp. 35–39
169. Jump up^ Moore, Taylour & French 1999
170. Jump up^ Renfrew, Mountjoy & Macfarlane 1985
171. Jump up^ Immerwahr 1990.
172. Jump up^ Taylour 1969, pp. 91–97; Taylour 1970, pp. 270–280.
173. Jump up^ Cavanagh & Mee 1998.
174. Jump up^ Taylour, French & Wardle 2007; Alden 2000.
175. Jump up^ Pelon 1976.
176. Jump up^ Hammond 1967, p. 90.
177. Jump up^ Dickinson 1977, pp. 33–34, 53, 59–60.
178. Jump up^ Lewartowski 2000.
179. Jump up^ Dickinson 1977, pp. 53, 107; Anthony 2007, p. 48.
180. Jump up^ Papadimitriou 2001.
181. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 97.
182. Jump up^ Kelder 2010, p. 95.
183. Jump up^ Graziado 1991, pp. 403–440.
184. ^ Jump up to:^a b c « Linear A and Linear B ». Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
185. Jump up^ « Sir Arthur Evans ». Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
186. Jump up^ « Michael Ventris ». Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
187. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Castleden 2005, p. 2.
188. Jump up^ Hansen 2004, p. 7.
189. Jump up^ Sansone 2004, « Greece in the Bronze Age », pp. 7–8.
190. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 235.
191. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 228.
192. Jump up^ Vallance, Richard (2015). « Did you Know you Speak Mycenaean Greek? You do! ». academia.edu. Retrieved 30 March 2016. Whether we realize it or not, not only are tens of thousands of English words direct derivatives of ancient Greek, but some are derived even from Mycenaean Greek, which makes them very ancient indeed!
193. ^ Jump up to:^a b Castleden 2005, p. 231
194. Jump up^ Castleden 2005, p. 230.

Sources

• Alden, Maureen Joan (2000). Well Built Mycenae (Volume 7): The Prehistoric Cemetery – pre-Mycenaean and Early Mycenaean Graves. Oxford: Oxbow Books. ISBN 978-1-84-217018-2.
• Burns, Bryan E. (2010). Mycenaean Greece, Mediterranean Commerce and the Formation of Identity (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521119542.
• D’Amato, Raphaelo; Salimbeti; illustrated by Giuseppe Rava, Andrea (2011). Bronze Age Greek Warrior 1600–1100 BC. Oxford, UK: Osprey Pub Co. ISBN 9781849081955.
• Balmuth, Miriam S.; Tykot, Robert H. (1998). Studies in Sardinian Archaeology, Volume 5. Ann Arbor, MI: Oxbow Books.
• Beckman, Gary M.; Bryce, Trevor R.; Cline, Eric H. (2012). Writings from the Ancient World: The Ahhiyawa Texts (PDF). Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. ISSN 1570-7008.
• Borza, Eugene N. (1992). In the Shadow of Olympus: The Emergence of Macedon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00880-6.
• Bryce, Trevor (2005). The Kingdom of the Hittites (New ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199279081.
• Budin, Stephanie Lynn (2009) [2004]. The Ancient Greeks: An Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537984-6.
• Castleden, Rodney (2005). The Mycenaeans. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-36336-5.
• Cavanagh, William G.; Mee, Christopher (1998). A Private Place: Death in Prehistoric Greece [SIMA 125]. Jonsered: Paul Aströms Förlag. ISBN 978-9-17-081178-4.
• Chadwick, John; Baumbach, Lydia (1963). « The Mycenaean Greek Vocabulary ». Glotta. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (GmbH & Co. KG). 41(3/4): 157–271.
• Chadwick, John (1976). The Mycenaean World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29037-6.
• Cline, Eric H. (2007). « Rethinking Mycenaean International Trade with Egypt and the Near East ». In Galaty, M.; Parkinson, W. Rethinking Mycenaean Palaces II: Revised and Expanded Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology. pp. 190–200.
• Cline, Eric H., ed. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-987360-9.
• Cline, Eric H. (2014). 1177 B.C. The Year Civilization Collapsed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-40-084998-7.
• D’Amato, Raphaelo; Salimbeti, Andrea (2011). Bronze Age Greek Warrior 1600–1100 BC. Oxford: Osprey Publishing Company. ISBN 9781849081955.
• de la Cruz, José Clemente Martín (1988). « Mykenische Keramik aus Bronzezeitlichen Siedlungsschichten von Montoro am Guadalquivir ». Madrider Mitteilungen (29): 77–92.
• Dickinson, Oliver (1977). The Origins of Mycenaean Civilization. Götenberg: Paul Aströms Förlag.
• Dickinson, Oliver (December 1999). Invasion, Migration and the Shaft Graves. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 43. pp. 97–107. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.1999.tb00480.x.
• Dickinson, Oliver (2006). The Aegean from Bronze Age to Iron Age: Continuity and Change between the Twelfth and Eighth Centuries BC. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-20-396836-9.
• Drews, Robert (1993). The End of the Bronze Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-69-102591-9.
• Feuer, Bryan Avery (2004). Mycenaean Civilization: An Annotated Bibliography through 2002. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc. ISBN 978-0-78-641748-3.
• Fields, Nic; illustrated by Donato Spedaliere (2004). Mycenaean Citadels c. 1350–1200 BC (3rd ed.). Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 9781841767628.
• Fields, Nic; illustrated by Brian Delf (2006). Bronze Age War Chariots. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 9781841769448. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
• Finley, Moses I. (1954). The World of Odysseus. New York, NY: New York Review Books. ISBN 978-1-59-017017-5.
• Fisher, Elizabeth A. (1998). The Mycenaeans and Apulia. An Examination of Aegean Bronze Age Contacts with Apulia in Eastern Magna Grecia. Jonsered, Sweden: Astrom.
• Freeman, Charles (2014). Egypt, Greece and Rome: Civilizations of the Ancient Mediterranean (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199651924.
• Furumark, Arne (1941). The Mycenaean Pottery: Analysis and Classification. Stockholm: Victor Pettersons Bokindustriaktiebolag.
• Graziado, Giampaolo (July 1991). « The Process of Social Stratification at Mycenae in the Shaft Grave Period: A Comparative Examination of the Evidence ». American Journal of Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. 95 (3): 403–440.
• Hägg, Robin; Marinatos, Nannó (1981). Sanctuaries and Cults in the Aegean Bronze Age: Proceedings of the First International Symposium at the Swedish Institute in Athens, 12-13 May, 1980. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen. ISBN 978-9-18-508643-6.
• Hajnal, Ivo; Posch, Claudia (2009). « Graeco-Anatolian Contacts in the Mycenaean Period ». Sprachwissenschaft Innsbruck Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
• Hammond, Nicholas G.L. (1967). « Tumulus Burial in Albania, the Grave Circles of Mycenae, and the Indo-Europeans ». Annual of the British School at Athens. 62.
• Hammond, Nicholas G.L. (1976). Migrations and Invasions in Greece and Adjacent Areas. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Press. ISBN 978-0-8155-5047-1.
• Hansen, William F. (2004). Handbook of Classical Mythology. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57-607226-4.
• Howard, Dan (2011). Bronze Age Military Equipment. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military. ISBN 9781848842939.
• Iacovou, Maria (2013). « Chapter Twenty-Two Aegean-Style Material Culture in Late Cypriot III: Minimal Evidence, Maximum Interpretation ». In Killebrew, Ann E.; Lehmann, Gunnar. The Philistines and other « Sea Peoples » in Text and Archaeology. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature. pp. 585–618. ISBN 978-1-58-983721-8.
• Immerwahr, Sara A. (1990). Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 978-0-27-100628-4.
• Kagan, Donald; Viggiano, Gregory F. (2013). Men of Bronze: Hoplite Warfare in Ancient Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400846306.
• Kelder, Jorrit M. (2010). « The Kingdom of Mycenae: A Great Kingdom in the Late Bronze Age Aegean ». http://www.academia.edu. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
• Kling, Barbara (1989). Mycenaean IIIC:1b and Related Pottery in Cyprus. Lund: P. Aströms Förlag. ISBN 978-9-18-609893-3.
• Latacz, Joachim (2004). Troy and Homer: Towards a Solution of an Old Mystery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199263080.
• Lewartowski, Kazimierz (2000). Late Helladic Simple Graves: A Study of Mycenaean Burial Customs (BAR International Series 878). Oxford: Archaeopress. ISBN 978-1-84-171079-2.
• Moore, A.D.; Taylour, W.D.; French, Elizabeth Bayard (1999). Well Built Mycenae (Volume 10): The Temple Complex. Warminster, England: Aris & Phillips. ISBN 978-1-84-217000-7.
• Morris, Ian (1996). « Greece: Dark Age Greece ». In Fagan, Brian M. The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 253–256. ISBN 9780195076189.
• Mylonas, George Emmanuel (1961). Eleusis and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Mylonas, George Emmanuel (1966). Mycenae and the Mycenaean Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Nikolaou, Kyriakos (1973). The First Myceneans in Cyprus. Nicosia: Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.
• Nilsson, Martin Persson (1940). Greek Popular Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Nilsson, Martin Persson (1967). Geschichte der Griechischen Religion (3rd ed.). Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag.
• Olsen, Barbara A. (2014). Women in Mycenaean Greece: The Linear B Tablets from Pylos and Knossos. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis. ISBN 978-1-31-774795-6.
• Palaima, Tom (1999). « Mycenaean Militarism from a Textual Perspective » (PDF). Polemos: Warfare in the Aegean Bronze Age (Aegaeum). 19: 367–378. Retrieved 14 October 2015.
• Papadimitriou, Nikolas (2001). Built Chamber Tombs of Middle and Late Bronze Age Date in Mainland Greece and the Islands (BAR International Series 925). Oxford: John and Erica Hedges Ltd. and Archaeopress. ISBN 978-1-84-171170-6.
• Pelon, Olivier (1976). Tholoi, Tumuli et Cercles Funéraires. Paris: Diffusion de Boccard.
• Peruzzi, Emilio (1980). Mycenaeans in Early Latium. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo & Bizzarri.
• Petrie, Sir William Matthew Flinders (1894). Tell el-Amarna. London: Methuen & Co.
• Renfrew, Colin; Mountjoy, Penelope A.; Macfarlane, Callum (1985). The Archaeology of Cult: The Sanctuary at Phylakopi. London: British School of Archaeology at Athens. ISBN 978-0-50-096021-9.
• Ridgway, David (1992). The First Western Greeks. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-52-142164-5.
• Runnels, Curtis Neil; Murray, Priscilla (2001). Greece before History: An Archaeological Companion and Guide. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-4050-0.
• Sansone, David (2004). Ancient Greek Civilization. Malden (Massachusetts), Oxford (United Kingdom), Carlton (Victoria, Australia): Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0-631-23236-2.
• Shear, Ione Mylonas (January 2000). « Excavations on the Acropolis of Midea: Results of the Greek–Swedish Excavations under the Direction of Katie Demakopoulou and Paul Åström ». American Journal of Archaeology. 104 (1): 133–134.
• Schofield, Louise (2006). The Mycenaeans. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum. ISBN 9780892368679.
• Stubbings, Frank H. (1951). Mycenaean Pottery from the Levant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tandy, David W. (2001). Prehistory and History: Ethnicity, Class and Political Economy. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Black Rose Books Limited. ISBN 1-55164-188-7.
• Tartaron, Thomas F. (2013). Maritime Networks in the Mycenaean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107067134.
• Taylour, Lord William; French, Elizabeth Bayard; Wardle, K.A. (2007). Well Built Mycenae (Volume 13): The Helleno-British Excavations within the Citadel at Mycenae 1959-1969. Warminster, England: Aris & Phillips. ISBN 978-1-84-217295-7.
• Taylour, Lord William (1969). « Mycenae, 1968 ». Antiquity. 43: 91–97.
• Taylour, Lord William (1970). « New Light on Mycenaean Religion ». Antiquity. 44: 270–280.
• Taylour, Lord William (1958). Mycenaean Pottery in Italy and Adjacent Areas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thomas, Carol G. (1995). « The Components of Political Identity in Mycenaean Greece » (PDF). Aegaeum. 12: 349–354. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2013.
• van Wijngaarden, Geert Jan (2002). Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (1600–1200 BC). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 978-9-05-356482-0.
• Vianello, Andrea (2005). Late Bronze Age Mycenaean and Italic Products in the West Mediterranean: A Social and Economic Analysis. Oxford: Archaeopress. ISBN 978-1-84-171875-0.
• Wardle, K.A.; Wardle, Diana (1997). Cities of Legend: The Mycenaean World. London: Bristol Classical Press. ISBN 978-1-85-399355-8.
• Wikander, Örjan (January–March 1990). « Archaic Roof Tiles the First Generations ». Hesperia. 59 (1): 285–290. doi:10.2307/148143.

Further reading

• Anthony, David W. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-05887-3.
• Barlow, Jane Atwood; Bolger, Diane L.; Kling, Barbara (1991). Cypriot Ceramics: Reading the Prehistoric Record. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. ISBN 978-0-92-417110-9.
• Burkert, Walter (1987) [1985]. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-11-872499-6.
• Doumas, Christos (1980). Thera and the Aegean World II: Papers Presented at the Second International Scientific Congress, Santorini, Greece, August 1978. London: Thera and the Aegean World. ISBN 978-0-95-061332-1.
• French, Elizabeth Bayard (2002). Mycenae: Agamemnon’s Capital. Stroud: Tempus. ISBN 0-7524-1951-X.
• Gitin, Seymour; Mazar, Amihay; Stern, Ephraim; Dothan, Trude Krakauer (1998). Mediterranean Peoples in Transition: Thirteenth to Early Tenth Centuries BCE. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society. ISBN 978-9-65-221036-4.
• Güterbock, Hans G. (April 1983). « The Hittites and the Aegean World: Part 1. The Ahhiyawa Problem Reconsidered ». American Journal of Archaeology. 87 (2): 133–138. doi:10.2307/504928.
• Güterbock, Hans G. (June 1984). « Hittites and Akhaeans: A New Look ». Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 128(2): 114–122.
• Hagg, Robin; Wells, Berit (1978). Opuscula Atheniensia XII. Lund: Paul Astroms Forlag. ISBN 978-9-18-508612-2.
• Hänsel, B. (ed.); Podzuweit, Christian (1982). « Die mykenische Welt und Troja ». Südosteuropa zwischen 1600 und 1000 V. Chr (in German). Berlin: Moreland Editions. pp. 65–88.
• Higgins, Reynold Alleyne (1997). Minoan and Mycenaean Art. London and New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-50-020303-3.
• Hooker, J.T. (1976). Mycenaean Greece. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Huxley, G.L. (1960). Achaeans and Greeks. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Mellink, Machteld J. (April 1983). « The Hittites and the Aegean World: Part 2. Archaeological Comments on Ahhiyawa-Achaians in Western Anatolia ». American Journal of Archaeology. 87 (2): 138–141. doi:10.2307/504929.
• Mountjoy, Penelope A. (1986). Mycenaean Decorated Pottery: A Guide to Identification (Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 73). Göteborg: Paul Aströms Forlag. ISBN 978-9-18-609832-2.
• Nur, Amos; Cline, Eric (2000). « Poseidon’s Horses: Plate Tectonics and Earthquake Storms in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean » (PDF). Journal of Archaeological Science. 27(1): 43–63. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0431. Archived from the original(PDF) on 21 September 2006.
• Preziosi, Donald; Hitchcock, Louise A. (1999). Aegean Art and Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-284208-4.
• Robertson, Martin (1959). Les Grands siècles de la peinture: La peinture Grecque. Genève-Paris: Skira.
• Skeat, T.C. (1934). The Dorians in Archaeology. London: de la More Press.
• Taylour, Lord William (1990) [1964]. The Mycenaeans. London: Thames & Hudson Limited. ISBN 978-0-50-027586-3.
• Vermeule, Emily; Karageorghis, Vassos (1982). Mycenaean Pictorial Vase Painting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-67-459650-4.
• Vermeule, Emily Townsend (March 1960). « The Fall of the Mycenaean Empire ». Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. 13(1): 66–76. doi:10.2307/41663738.
• Weiss, Barry (June 1982). « The Decline of Late Bronze Age Civilization as a Possible Response to Climatic Change ». Climatic Change. 4 (2): 173–198. doi:10.1007/bf00140587. ISSN 0165-0009.

External links

• Godart, Louis (2013) [January 1997]. « Les citadelles mycéniennes » (in French). Clio.
• Hemingway, Seán; Hemingway, Colette (2000–2013). « Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History: Mycenaean Civilization ». The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
• Horejs, Barbara; Pavúk, Peter, eds. (2007). « The Aegeo-Balkan Prehistory Project ». The Aegeo-Balkan Prehistory Team.
• Rutter, Jeremy B. « Prehistoric Archeology of the Aegean ». Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College.
• Salimbetti, Andrea (September 2015). « The Greek Age of Bronze ».
• « The Mycenaeans and Italy: The Archaeological and Archaeometric Ceramic Evidence ». University of Glasgow School of Humanities.
• Wright, James C. (2002). « The Nemea Valley Archaeological Project: Internet Edition ». Bryn Mawr College Department of Classical and Near Eastern Archaeology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycenaean_Greece

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com